Sunday, October 27, 2013

Use of Rushkoff's "Time Binding" in West Wing's "Isaac & Ishmael"

One of Rushkoff’s most interesting points was the idea that humans are capable of what he described as “time binding.” “We can take the experiences of one generation and pass it on to the next generation through language and symbols. “We can still teach our children things like hunting or fishing in real time, but our lessons can be compressed into stories, instructions, and diagrams,” (Rushkoff 137). This idea of passing lessons down through generations is a tried and true habit of humans. From the orally passed teachings of Homer, which warn us against things such as hubris; to the written warning against strong government, such as that of Orwell’s 1984, humans have passed down their combined findings of the world to future generations. This has allowed people to learn from the collective knowledge of their society, rather than take the large amount of time required to learn each lesson through personal experience.

            Now, in the age of technology, this “time binding” has moved from the medium of writing to the medium of television. This use of time binding in television can be clearly seen in the show, West Wing, during their episode Isaac and Ishmael, a reaction to the events of terrorism. Many people in America had never witnessed such a large terrorist attack before, and therefore did not know how to respond. However, the combined information that the writers of West Wing had (undoubtedly passed down to them from other generations, even further removed), had the ability to give viewers a fresh perspective on terrorism. For example, Bradley Whitford is able to explain to the students he is talking to (and in turn the viewers of the show) that not all Islamic people are terrorists through the analogy: Islamic extremists are to the Islamic faith as the KKK is to Christianity. Although I have been able to realize through my own time binding experience that all Islamic people are not terrorists, I had never heard such an analogy, and was very impressed by this new perspective. This perspective is one that may not have been available to the terrorism-shocked Americans in the 21st century, aside from those who were directly involved with the Islamic people, and only became available through the human art of time binding.


            On the other hand, John Spencer, the man who interrogated Rakim Ali, the Arab-American working in the Whitehouse, was not aided by time binding. When Spencer learned that Rakim Ali (a fairly common Arab name) came up as both the alias of a known terrorist, as well as one of the men who worked in the Whitehouse, he immediately began to viciously interrogate the man working in the Whitehouse. Throughout the interrogation, Spencer continued to antagonize Rakim, accusing him of all sorts of things, simply because he was an Arab-American. In the end, Spencer was informed that the man he was interrogating was in fact innocent, and had to apologize profusely. Unable, or at least unwilling, to rely on the time binding from past generations; Spencer had to learn from his own experiences that all Islamic people are not terrorists, which was a much more painful experience.

Work Cited:

Rushkoff, Douglas. Present Shock. New York: Penguin Group, 2013. Print.
"Isaac and Ishmael." West Wing. Writ. Aaron Sorkin. Dir. Christopher Misiano. Warner Brothers, 2001. Web.

2 comments:

  1. Laura, I appreciate the concepts that you connected between Present Shock and West Wing’s “Isaac and Ishmael” episode. I attempted to relate Rushkoff’s writing to the episode in a completely different way, and did not once consider “time binding”. I think you make a very astute observation in demonstrating how “Isaac and Ishmael” conveys a message built from many years of experience with terrorism. The relation to the KKK helps to make the idea that not all Muslims are terrorists more relevant to American minds. Narratives are a very powerful means of time binding, as you mention with Homeric tradition or Orwell’s 1984.
    I think it is fair to summon Rushkoff’s metaphor or RAM versus hard-drive storage. There is the presentist means of handling reality and the historically-minded means, but a mixture of both is necessary. You mention how John Spencer’s interrogation of Rakim Ali was largely ignoring of time-bound information. However, I would almost say the opposite: Spencer brought many accusations against Rakim Ali based on present connections (the name) as well as events and connections from the past. Where John Spencer stumbled, however, was being too focused on the past, too focused on the map rather than the territory. Conversely, the student discussion in the lunchroom featured speakers with varied amounts of RAM and hard-drive processing. Together, the speakers formed a fairly comprehensive and responsibly time-bound lesson for the students (and thus the television viewer).
    At least, that may be a means to break down the situation. I am sure the episode may be viewed from a few critical approaches. Good post, Laura.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Laura, I thought this was a fantastic post! Many ideas you mentioned were extremely true and did not even cross my mind. I loved your relation of "time binding" (taking the experiences of one generation and passing them on to the next generation through language and symbols) to the medium that is television and more specifically, The West Wing. By taking the experiences of one generation, such as the "9/11 Generation", and implementing them in a controversial but informative episode like "Isaac and Ishmael" to not only help viewers who possibly weren't there or do not know about the event much learn about it with a fresh mindset. I think it's important to understand that people in the future, 3000's even, will know of 9/11, but not of the impacts it had on society today. I think by pointing out this "time binding" that "Isaac and Ishmael" demonstrates, it is clear that viewers of the show in the far future will get a good grip on what it did to us as a nation. Rushkoff's idea of Time Binding fits perfectly in this sense and was perfectly used, in my opinion! One point that confused me was your idea of John Spencer not being able to rely on the Time Binding of his past, exemplified when he rudely interrogated Rakim Ali. I personally believe that even before 9/11, Americans had an apparent hostility to people of Middle Eastern descent. Do you think that Spencer was raised/gained experience in an environment hostile toward Middle Eastern people in any way? It's something to think about, as it is possible that the effects of "Time Binding" acted on him. Besides this slight point, I think your post was great. Nice job, Laura!

    ReplyDelete